Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to purchase Greenland, coupled with threats of military action, has sparked a political situation where the United States could face deep internal divisions.
What began as a controversial idea in 2019 has escalated further after Trump’s return to power in 2025. After Denmark’s rejection, Trump has even suggested the possibility of a military takeover—an action that conflicts with international law and the 1951 military agreement between the two countries.
In this complex scenario, the U.S. military could face a profound dilemma—torn between following the aggressive orders of the President and upholding the longstanding security commitments outlined in the treaty.
If Denmark seeks support from NATO and the European Union, the U.S. would find itself in a paradoxical position—acting both as an aggressor and a defender simultaneously.
Analysts warn that Greenland’s growing geopolitical and strategic importance makes this crisis a major challenge for the Western alliance. Trump’s sudden and aggressive decisions risk pushing the situation toward greater instability.
The pressing question remains: Is the United States on a path toward conflict within its own ranks?
